|
UNIVERSITAS ISLAM NEGERI MATARAM
|
RPS-07-TBI0418 |
| RENCANA PEMBELAJARAN SEMESTER | ||||||
| MATA KULIAH (MK) | KODE | Rumpun MK | BOBOT (sks) | SEMESTER | Tanggal Penyusunan | |
| Academic Writing* | TBI0418 | Writing skills including paragraph, essay, argumentative, and academic writing | 2 | 0 | 6 | 13 Jul 2026 |
| Pengesahan | Dosen Pengembang RPS | Koordinator RMK | Ka PRODI |
 Dr. Ribahan, S.S., M.Pd. |
 Dr. Afif. Ihwanul Muslimin, S.S, M.Pd |
 Dr. Ika Rama Suhandra, M.Pd. |
| Capaian Pembelajaran | CPL-PRODI yang dibebankan pada MK | |
| CPL 3 | Mampu menerapkan pemikiran logis, kritis, sistematis, kontekstual, komprehensif, dan inovatif dalam pengembangan dan penerapan ilmu pengetahuan dan teknologi di bidang Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris dengan memperhatikan nilai-nilai sosial humaniora. | |
| CPL 5 | Mampu merancang dan melaksanakan pembelajaran Bahasa Inggris yang berpusat pada peserta didik secara efektif dan kontekstual dengan mengintegrasikan nilai-nilai keislaman, sesuai etika keguruan serta perkembangan ilmu pengetahuan dan teknologi. | |
| CPL 7 | Mampu menerapkan keterampilan berbahasa Inggris secara lisan dan tulis untuk mendukung kegiatan kewirausahaan di bidang pendidikan dan layanan kebahasaan secara profesional dan komunikatif. | |
| Capaian Pembelajaran Mata Kuliah (CPMK) | ||
| CPMK 6 | Mahasiswa mampu merefleksikan dan mendemonstrasikan diri sebagai teladan bagi peserta didik dan masyarakat melalui perilaku moderat, berakhlak mulia, serta kompetensi profesional dalam konteks peran ganda sebagai pendidik, peneliti, dan entrepreneur pendidikan bahasa Inggris, termasuk dalam penyelesaian studi kasus atau proyek kolaboratif berorientasi global. | |
| CPMK 8 | Mahasiswa mampu merancang solusi inovatif berbasis ilmu pengetahuan dan teknologi (seperti pengembangan materi ajar digital, aplikasi pembelajaran interaktif, atau strategi pengajaran berbasis proyek) dalam bidang Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris, dengan menerapkan pemikiran kritis, sistematis, dan komprehensif yang mengintegrasikan nilai humaniora (etika penggunaan teknologi, penghormatan terhadap keragaman peserta didik, dan dampak sosial), serta menunjukkan kepekaan kontekstual terhadap kebutuhan pembelajar di era global. | |
| CPMK 11 | Mahasiswa mampu menghasilkan gagasan atau desain inovatif berbasis ilmu pengetahuan dan teknologi (contoh: modul pembelajaran berbasis gamifikasi, materi literasi kritis berbasis teks autentik digital, atau strategi pengajaran berbasis proyek lintas budaya) di bidang Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris, dengan mematuhi tata cara dan etika ilmiah serta secara eksplisit menerapkan nilai humaniora (keadilan pendidikan, penghargaan terhadap pluralitas, dan pertimbangan dampak psikologis serta sosial terhadap peserta didik). | |
| Kemampuan akhir tiap tahapan belajar (Sub-CPMK) | ||
| sub.cpmk.TBI0418.CPMK 11.1 | Being able to critically analyze and synthesize scholarly literature to identify patterns, gaps, and relationships relevant to a research topic. | |
| sub.cpmk.TBI0418.CPMK 11.2 | Being able to evaluate peer academic texts and revise their own writing using structured feedback and digital revision tools to improve clarity, coherence, and academic quality. | |
| sub.cpmk.TBI0418.CPMK 11.3 | Being able to produce an original, coherent, and academically sound article in English by integrating appropriate structure, scholarly sources, ethical practices, and academic writing conventions. | |
| sub.cpmk.TBI0418.CPMK 6.1 | Being able to explain the course objectives, scope, assessment system, and learning contract, and to demonstrate commitment to academic responsibilities and ethical conduct throughout the academic writing course. | |
| sub.cpmk.TBI0418.CPMK 6.2 | Being able to explain the purposes, characteristics, and uses of major international English proficiency tests in academic and professional contexts. | |
| sub.cpmk.TBI0418.CPMK 6.3 | Being able to apply appropriate academic style, formal language features, and coherence devices in written texts to produce clear, consistent, and logically connected academic paragraphs. | |
| sub.cpmk.TBI0418.CPMK 6.4 | Being able to construct well-developed academic paragraphs using effective topic sentences, supporting evidence, and concluding or transitional sentences in accordance with scientific writing conventions. | |
| sub.cpmk.TBI0418.CPMK 6.5 | Being able to formulate logical and persuasive academic arguments by integrating claims, evidence, and counterarguments into a coherent written essay. | |
| sub.cpmk.TBI0418.CPMK 8.1 | Being able to locate, evaluate, and document relevant scholarly sources and produce organized academic notes to support evidence-based writing. | |
| sub.cpmk.TBI0418.CPMK 8.2 | Being able to summarize, paraphrase, and synthesize ideas from multiple academic sources accurately while preserving the original meaning and avoiding plagiarism. | |
| sub.cpmk.TBI0418.CPMK 8.3 | Being able to use AI-assisted and digital writing tools critically and ethically to support planning, drafting, revising, and editing academic texts. | |
| sub.cpmk.TBI0418.CPMK 8.4 | Being able to demonstrate academic integrity by applying ethical writing principles and plagiarism-prevention strategies to all academic writing tasks. | |
| sub.cpmk.TBI0418.CPMK 8.5 | Being able to apply APA-style in-text citations and reference lists accurately and consistently in academic writing. | |
| sub.cpmk.TBI0418.CPMK 8.6 | Being able to compose effective abstracts, introductions, and conclusions that clearly present the research purpose, scope, and key findings using appropriate academic conventions. | |
| Korelasi CPMK terhadap Sub-CPMK | ||
| CPMK 6 |
sub.cpmk.TBI0418.CPMK 6.1 sub.cpmk.TBI0418.CPMK 6.2 sub.cpmk.TBI0418.CPMK 6.3 sub.cpmk.TBI0418.CPMK 6.4 sub.cpmk.TBI0418.CPMK 6.5 |
|
| CPMK 8 |
sub.cpmk.TBI0418.CPMK 8.1 sub.cpmk.TBI0418.CPMK 8.2 sub.cpmk.TBI0418.CPMK 8.3 sub.cpmk.TBI0418.CPMK 8.4 sub.cpmk.TBI0418.CPMK 8.5 sub.cpmk.TBI0418.CPMK 8.6 |
|
| CPMK 11 |
sub.cpmk.TBI0418.CPMK 11.1 sub.cpmk.TBI0418.CPMK 11.2 sub.cpmk.TBI0418.CPMK 11.3 |
|
| Deskripsi Singkat MK | This course equips students with comprehensive knowledge and practical skills for major English language proficiency tests. Students will learn about the structure, content, and purposes of major standardized English tests, including TOEFL (iBT, PBT, and ITP formats), IELTS (Academic and General), TOEIC, PTE Academic, CAE (Cambridge Advanced English), and other relevant assessments. The course will cover test components such as listening, reading, writing, speaking, grammar, and vocabulary, as well as test-taking strategies and scoring criteria. | |
| Bahan Kajian : Materi Pembelajaran | Course Introduction and Learning Contract Introduction to International English Proficiency Tests Principles of Language Testing and Assessment Literacy TOEFL Test Formats and Structure IELTS Academic and General Training Other Proficiency Tests (TOEIC, PTE Academic, CAE) Listening Skills in Proficiency Tests Reading and Writing Skills in Proficiency Tests Speaking Skills in Proficiency Tests Grammar and Vocabulary for Proficiency Tests Test-Taking Strategies and Time Management Scoring Systems and Score Interpretation Developing Test Preparation Materials Guiding Learners in Test Preparation | |
| Pustaka | Utama | |
|
||
| Pendukung | ||
|
|
||
| Dosen Pengampu | Dr. Ribahan, S.S., M.Pd. | |
| Mata Kuliah Syarat | - | |
| Pertemuan Ke | Kemampuan akhir tiap tahapan belajar (Sub-CPMK) | Penilaian | Bentuk Pembelajaran; Metode Pembelajaran; Penugasan Mahasiswa; | Materi Pembelajaran | Bobot Penilaian | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Indikator | Kriteria & Teknik | Luring | Daring | ||||
| 1 | sub.cpmk.TBI0418.CPMK 6.1-Being able to explain the course objectives, scope, assessment system, and learning contract, and to demonstrate commitment to academic responsibilities and ethical conduct throughout the academic writing course. | The students can explain the course objectives, scope, and assessment components; demonstrate understanding of the learning contract and agreed academic responsibilities; and follow course rules, deadlines, and participation requirements. |
Kriteria Performing Task Accurately Teknik Partisipasi |
Kuliah Tatap Muka,Classroom Discussion,[CD=100 Menit] |
Topik Course Introduction and Learning Contract Sub Topik |
6 | |
| 2 | sub.cpmk.TBI0418.CPMK 6.2-Being able to explain the purposes, characteristics, and uses of major international English proficiency tests in academic and professional contexts. | Students can identify the structural components of academic texts, explain key characteristics of academic writing, and analyze sample academic texts systematically using appropriate academic criteria. |
Kriteria Performing Task Accurately Teknik Penugasan |
Kuliah Tatap Muka,Classroom Discussion,[CD=100 Menit] |
Topik Structure and Characteristics of Academic Writing Sub Topik |
6 | |
| 3 | sub.cpmk.TBI0418.CPMK 6.3-Being able to apply appropriate academic style, formal language features, and coherence devices in written texts to produce clear, consistent, and logically connected academic paragraphs. | Students can use formal and appropriate academic language in written texts, apply coherence devices effectively within paragraphs, and maintain consistency in tone, tense, and academic style across a written text. |
Kriteria Explaining the Point Accurately Teknik Penugasan |
Kuliah Tatap Muka,Classroom Discussion,[CD=100 Menit] |
Topik Academic Writing Style, Formality, and Textual Coherence Sub Topik |
6 | |
| 4 | sub.cpmk.TBI0418.CPMK 6.4-Being able to construct well-developed academic paragraphs using effective topic sentences, supporting evidence, and concluding or transitional sentences in accordance with scientific writing conventions. | Students can write clear and focused topic sentences that reflect paragraph main ideas, provide relevant supporting evidence and explanations within paragraphs, and use concluding or transitional sentences to maintain paragraph unity and flow connective use. |
Kriteria Explaining the Point Accurately Teknik Penugasan |
Kuliah Tatap Muka,Classroom Discussion,[CD=100 Menit] |
Topik Techniques for Developing Paragraphs in Scientific Writing Sub Topik |
6 | |
| 5 | sub.cpmk.TBI0418.CPMK 6.5-Being able to formulate logical and persuasive academic arguments by integrating claims, evidence, and counterarguments into a coherent written essay. | Students can formulate clear academic claims or thesis statements and support arguments with relevant evidence from scholarly sources, and incorporate counterarguments and rebuttals to strengthen their written arguments. |
Kriteria Project Submission Teknik Penugasan |
Kuliah Tatap Muka,Classroom Discussion,[CD=100 Menit] |
Topik Strategies for Writing Strong Arguments in Academic Essays Sub Topik |
6 | |
| 6 | sub.cpmk.TBI0418.CPMK 8.1-Being able to locate, evaluate, and document relevant scholarly sources and produce organized academic notes to support evidence-based writing. | Students can locate relevant and credible scholarly sources using academic databases, evaluate sources based on relevance, credibility, and academic quality, and produce organized academic notes to support the writing process. |
Kriteria Project Submission Teknik Penugasan |
Kuliah Tatap Muka,Classroom Discussion,[CD=100 Menit] |
Topik Reading, Note-Taking, and Finding Scholarly Sources Sub Topik |
6 | |
| 7 | sub.cpmk.TBI0418.CPMK 8.2-Being able to summarize, paraphrase, and synthesize ideas from multiple academic sources accurately while preserving the original meaning and avoiding plagiarism. | Students can accurately summarize key ideas from academic sources, paraphrase academic texts using appropriate vocabulary and sentence structures, and synthesize ideas from multiple sources into a coherent written section without plagiarism. |
Kriteria Project Submission Teknik Penugasan |
Kuliah Tatap Muka,Classroom Discussion,[CD=100 Menit] |
Topik Summarizing, Paraphrasing, and Synthesizing Texts Sub Topik |
6 | |
| 8 | sub.cpmk.TBI0418.CPMK 8.3-Being able to use AI-assisted and digital writing tools critically and ethically to support planning, drafting, revising, and editing academic texts. | Middle Test |
Kriteria Project Submission Teknik Middle Test |
Kuliah Tatap Muka,Classroom Discussion,[CD=100 Menit] |
Topik Middle Test Sub Topik |
6 | |
| 9 | sub.cpmk.TBI0418.CPMK 8.4-Being able to demonstrate academic integrity by applying ethical writing principles and plagiarism-prevention strategies to all academic writing tasks. | Students can use AI-assisted and digital tools to support drafting, revising, or editing academic texts, evaluate AI-generated output critically and revise it to ensure accuracy and originality, and apply ethical principles when using AI and digital tools in academic writing. |
Kriteria Project Submission Teknik Penugasan |
Kuliah Tatap Muka,Classroom Discussion,[CD=100 Menit] |
Topik AI-Assisted and Digital Tools for Academic Writing Sub Topik |
6 | |
| 10 | sub.cpmk.TBI0418.CPMK 8.5-Being able to apply APA-style in-text citations and reference lists accurately and consistently in academic writing. | Students can identify different forms of plagiarism in academic texts, apply appropriate plagiarism-prevention strategies in their writing, and demonstrate ethical decision-making in the use of sources and ideas. |
Kriteria Project Submission Teknik Penugasan |
Kuliah Tatap Muka,Classroom Discussion,[CD=100 Menit] |
Topik Academic Integrity: Plagiarism Prevention and Ethical Writing Sub Topik |
6 | |
| 11 | sub.cpmk.TBI0418.CPMK 8.6-Being able to compose effective abstracts, introductions, and conclusions that clearly present the research purpose, scope, and key findings using appropriate academic conventions. | Students can apply APA-style in-text citations accurately for various source types, compile reference lists that follow APA formatting conventions, and demonstrate consistency and accuracy in citation and referencing practices. |
Kriteria Project Submission Teknik Penugasan |
Kuliah Tatap Muka,Classroom Discussion,[CD=100 Menit] |
Topik Referencing and In-Text Citation (APA Style) Sub Topik |
6 | |
| 12 | sub.cpmk.TBI0418.CPMK 11.1-Being able to critically analyze and synthesize scholarly literature to identify patterns, gaps, and relationships relevant to a research topic. | Students can write abstracts that clearly summarize research purpose, methods, and key findings, compose introductions that present background, research focus, and objectives, and write conclusions that synthesize main ideas and highlight implications. |
Kriteria Project Submission Teknik Penugasan |
Kuliah Tatap Muka,Classroom Discussion,[CD=100 Menit] |
Topik Writing Effective Abstracts, Introductions, and Conclusions Sub Topik |
6 | |
| 13 | sub.cpmk.TBI0418.CPMK 11.2-Being able to evaluate peer academic texts and revise their own writing using structured feedback and digital revision tools to improve clarity, coherence, and academic quality. | Students can critically evaluate scholarly sources rather than merely summarizing them, compare and contrast findings from multiple studies, and identify research gaps, trends, or relationships in the literature. |
Kriteria Project Submission Teknik Penugasan |
Kuliah Tatap Muka,Classroom Discussion,[CD=100 Menit] |
Topik Critical Analysis in Literature Review Writing Sub Topik |
6 | |
| 14 | sub.cpmk.TBI0418.CPMK 11.3-Being able to produce an original, coherent, and academically sound article in English by integrating appropriate structure, scholarly sources, ethical practices, and academic writing conventions. | Students produce an original academic article with appropriate structure and organization, integrate scholarly sources using accurate citation and referencing practices, and demonstrate academic integrity, coherence, and clarity throughout the article. |
Kriteria Project Submission Teknik Penugasan |
Kuliah Tatap Muka,Classroom Discussion,[CD=100 Menit] |
Topik Peer Review, Digital Feedback, and Revision Techniques Sub Topik |
6 | |
| 15 | sub.cpmk.TBI0418.CPMK 11.1-Being able to critically analyze and synthesize scholarly literature to identify patterns, gaps, and relationships relevant to a research topic. | Students can produce an original academic article in English that follows a clear and logical structure, integrate relevant scholarly sources appropriately, and demonstrate ethical and academically sound writing practices. |
Kriteria Project Submission Teknik Penugasan |
Kuliah Tatap Muka,Classroom Discussion,[CD=100 Menit] |
Topik Composing an Original Academic Article Sub Topik |
6 | |
| 16 | sub.cpmk.TBI0418.CPMK 11.2-Being able to evaluate peer academic texts and revise their own writing using structured feedback and digital revision tools to improve clarity, coherence, and academic quality. | Final Test |
Kriteria Project Submission Teknik Final Test |
Kuliah Tatap Muka,Classroom Discussion,[CD=100 Menit] |
Topik Final Test Sub Topik |
6 | |
Teknik Penilaian CPMK
| CPL | MK | CPMK | Oral Test |
|---|---|---|---|
| CPL 2 | Academic Writing* | CPMK 6 | Y |
| CPL 3 | Academic Writing* | CPMK 8 | Y |
| CPL 4 | Academic Writing* | CPMK 11 | Y |
Prosedur Penilaian CPMK
1. Komponen Penilaian CPMK
| CPL | CPMK | Sub-CPMK | Detail Penugasan (Teknik Penilaian) | Bobot % | Kriteria Penilaian |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CPL 2 | CPMK 6 | sub.cpmk.TBI0418.CPMK 6.1 | Partisipasi | 6 | Performing Task Accurately |
| CPL 2 | CPMK 6 | sub.cpmk.TBI0418.CPMK 6.2 | Penugasan | 6 | Performing Task Accurately |
| CPL 2 | CPMK 6 | sub.cpmk.TBI0418.CPMK 6.3 | Penugasan | 6 | Explaining the Point Accurately |
| CPL 2 | CPMK 6 | sub.cpmk.TBI0418.CPMK 6.4 | Penugasan | 6 | Explaining the Point Accurately |
| CPL 2 | CPMK 6 | sub.cpmk.TBI0418.CPMK 6.5 | Penugasan | 6 | Project Submission |
| CPL 3 | CPMK 8 | sub.cpmk.TBI0418.CPMK 8.1 | Penugasan | 6 | Project Submission |
| CPL 3 | CPMK 8 | sub.cpmk.TBI0418.CPMK 8.2 | Penugasan | 6 | Project Submission |
| CPL 3 | CPMK 8 | sub.cpmk.TBI0418.CPMK 8.3 | Middle Test | 6 | Project Submission |
| CPL 3 | CPMK 8 | sub.cpmk.TBI0418.CPMK 8.4 | Penugasan | 6 | Project Submission |
| CPL 3 | CPMK 8 | sub.cpmk.TBI0418.CPMK 8.5 | Penugasan | 6 | Project Submission |
| CPL 3 | CPMK 8 | sub.cpmk.TBI0418.CPMK 8.6 | Penugasan | 6 | Project Submission |
| CPL 4 | CPMK 11 | sub.cpmk.TBI0418.CPMK 11.1 | Penugasan | 6 | Project Submission |
| CPL 4 | CPMK 11 | sub.cpmk.TBI0418.CPMK 11.2 | Penugasan | 6 | Project Submission |
| CPL 4 | CPMK 11 | sub.cpmk.TBI0418.CPMK 11.3 | Penugasan | 6 | Project Submission |
| CPL 4 | CPMK 11 | sub.cpmk.TBI0418.CPMK 11.1 | Penugasan | 6 | Project Submission |
| CPL 4 | CPMK 11 | sub.cpmk.TBI0418.CPMK 11.2 | Final Test | 6 | Project Submission |
| Total | 96 | ||||
2. Penilaian CPMK
| CPL | MK | CPMK | Oral Test | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CPL 2 | Academic Writing* | CPMK 6 | 30% | 30% |
| CPL 3 | Academic Writing* | CPMK 8 | 36% | 36% |
| CPL 4 | Academic Writing* | CPMK 11 | 30% | 30% |
| 96% | ||||